![]() We know Raguel didn’t feel justified in exacting vengeance in the story he told, but that was a very different situation. Two, why would Raguel absolve him of this crime? The killing wasn’t done out of love, as far as any information we were given, so absolution goes directly against the function Raguel was created to perform. ![]() One, what? The narrator, other than feeling out of place and out of sorts, gave no indication he had killed anyone or that he would have any reason to kill anyone. I plan to read it again tonight, but have been thinking about it all day. It left me with a few questions I’d love someone to give me their thoughts or let me know what I may have missed. I read this short story last night and have read it at least once before (because the book was already on my Kindle and I do recall some of the other short stories in the collection) and only realized this time that the main character is supposed to have killed Tink, her sister and her child before meeting Raguel and hearing his story. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |